Florida Bar v. Wilkes

200 So. 2d 177, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3935
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Florida Bar v. Wilkes. Read the opinion of the Court — 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3919
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 28, 1967·No. No. 34886·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Respondent’s motion for reinstatement to active status at The Florida Bar is denied. Under our second opinion, 199 So. 2d 472, filed April 19, 1967, Respondent is entitled at the present time to demonstrate to The Florida Bar that he has rehabilitated himself and should be reinstated to practice. Respondent’s attention is directed to Rule VIII (2) of the Integration Rules of The Florida Bar, 31 F.S.A. with respect to the matter of Florida Bar dues.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida Bar v. Wilkes, 200 So. 2d 177, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3935 (Fla. 1967).

200 So. 2d 177 (Florida Bar v. Wilkes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Bar v. Wilkes
199 So. 2d 472 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)