Florida Bar v. Warren

661 So. 2d 304, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 537, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1616, 1995 WL 598612
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 12, 1995·No. No. 84621·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This Court previously enjoined respondent from the unlicensed practice of law. Florida Bar v. Warren, 655 So.2d 1131 (Fla.1995). At the same time we entered an order to show cause why respondent should not be ordered to pay restitution to those individuals who paid for his purported legal services. Thereafter, respondent filed a statement in response to the order to show cause. The Court notes that the Rules Governing the Investigation and Prosecution of the Unlicensed Practice of Law contained in chapter 10 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar contain no provision authorizing the ordering of restitution. Upon consideration, the order .to show cause is hereby discharged. Those persons aggrieved by respondent’s action may seek redress through civil proceedings. The injunction against respondent remains in full force and effect.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida Bar v. Warren, 661 So. 2d 304, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 537, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1616, 1995 WL 598612 (Fla. 1995).

661 So. 2d 304 (Florida Bar v. Warren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Bar Re Amendments to Rules Regulating the Florida Bar
685 So. 2d 1203 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
State v. Pender
661 So. 2d 304 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)