Florida Bar v. Swedlow

Supreme Court of Florida

Florida Bar v. Swedlow

475 So. 2d 229, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 492, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3738

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedAugust 30, 1985

DocketNo. 65470

StatusPublished

This text of 475 So. 2d 229 (Florida Bar v. Swedlow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida Bar v. Swedlow, 475 So. 2d 229, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 492, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3738 (Fla. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In response to a complaint filed by the Florida Bar, Robert H. Swedlow, a member of the bar, tendered a conditional guilty plea for consent judgment, to which the bar agreed. The referee recommends that Swedlow be found guilty of violating disciplinary rules 1-102(A)(6) (conduct that adversely reflects on fitness to practice law) and 6-101(A)(3) (neglect of a legal matter entrusted to him) and article XI, rule 11.-02(3) of the integration rule (commission of an act contrary to honesty, justice, or good morals). The referee also recommends a public reprimand and a two-year probation with conditions.

After reviewing the record, we accept the referee’s findings. We hereby reprimand Robert H. Swedlow and place him on probation for two years,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In response to a complaint filed by the Florida Bar, Robert H. Swedlow, a member of the bar, tendered a conditional guilty plea for consent judgment, to which the bar agreed. The referee recommends that Swedlow be found guilty of violating disciplinary rules 1-102(A)(6) (conduct that adversely reflects on fitness to practice law) and 6-101(A)(3) (neglect of a legal matter entrusted to him) and article XI, rule 11.-02(3) of the integration rule (commission of an act contrary to honesty, justice, or good morals). The referee also recommends a public reprimand and a two-year probation with conditions.

After reviewing the record, we accept the referee’s findings. We hereby reprimand Robert H. Swedlow and place him on probation for two years,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

475 So. 2d 229, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 492, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-swedlow-fla-1985.