Florida Bar v. Soven

Supreme Court of Florida

Florida Bar v. Soven

484 So. 2d 4, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 96, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 1676

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 6, 1986

DocketNo. 67989

StatusPublished

This text of 484 So. 2d 4 (Florida Bar v. Soven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida Bar v. Soven, 484 So. 2d 4, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 96, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 1676 (Fla. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding is before us on complaint of The Florida Bar, respondent’s conditional guilty plea for consent judgment, and the uncontested report of the referee. Respondent tendered a guilty plea acknowledging his violation of The Florida Bar Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(6) (conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law) and 6-101(A)(3) (neglect of a legal matter entrusted to him). The referee recommended that respondent be found guilty in accordance with his plea and receive a public reprimand.

We approve the referee’s findings and recommendation. The publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter shall serve as respondent’s reprimand. Judgment for costs in the amount of $737.18 is hereby entered against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, Acting C.J., and MCDONALD, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding is before us on complaint of The Florida Bar, respondent’s conditional guilty plea for consent judgment, and the uncontested report of the referee. Respondent tendered a guilty plea acknowledging his violation of The Florida Bar Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(6) (conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law) and 6-101(A)(3) (neglect of a legal matter entrusted to him). The referee recommended that respondent be found guilty in accordance with his plea and receive a public reprimand.

We approve the referee’s findings and recommendation. The publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter shall serve as respondent’s reprimand. Judgment for costs in the amount of $737.18 is hereby entered against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, Acting C.J., and MCDONALD, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARRETT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

484 So. 2d 4, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 96, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 1676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-soven-fla-1986.