Florida Bar v. Shannon

Supreme Court of Florida

Florida Bar v. Shannon

506 So. 2d 1036, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 230, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 1857

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMay 7, 1987

DocketNo. 69224

StatusPublished

This text of 506 So. 2d 1036 (Florida Bar v. Shannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida Bar v. Shannon, 506 So. 2d 1036, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 230, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 1857 (Fla. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding is before us on The Florida Bar’s complaint, the respondent’s conditional guilty plea, and the referee’s uncontested report. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

The referee accepted respondent’s conditional plea and found respondent guilty of the following: (1) respondent violated the Code of Professional Responsibility of The Florida Bar, Rule 1-102(A)(4) (engaging in conduct involving fraud, misrepresentation, dishonesty and deceit), and Rule 1-102(A)(6) (conduct reflecting adversely on fitness to practice law), by failing to return his 5V2 year-old daughter to his former wife and the child’s mother, contrary to a court-ordered child visitation order; (2) respondent violated The Florida Bar’s Code of Professional Responsibility Rule 1-102(A)(6) (conduct reflecting adversely on fitness to practice law), and Rule 7-101(A)(2) (failing to carry out a contract for professional services), by abandoning his law practice and neglecting a client’s divorce case without notifying the client; and (3) respondent violated The Florida Bar’s Code of Professional Responsibility Rule 1-102(A)(6) (conduct reflecting adversely on fitness to practice law), and Rule 9-102(B)(4) (failing to promptly pay or deliver funds which a client is entitled to receive), by withholding a brokerage commission fee from a real estate salesman and withdrawing attorney’s fees from an escrow account without authorization.

[1037]*1037In accordance with respondent’s conditional guilty plea for consent judgment, the referee recommended a six-months’ suspension, retroactive to three months from the date of this opinion, with proof of his rehabilitation being required prior to readmission in accordance with Rule 3-5.1(e), Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. We accept the plea, approve the referee’s report, and impose the recommended discipline. Judgment for costs in the amount of $740.66 is hereby entered against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding is before us on The Florida Bar’s complaint, the respondent’s conditional guilty plea, and the referee’s uncontested report. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

The referee accepted respondent’s conditional plea and found respondent guilty of the following: (1) respondent violated the Code of Professional Responsibility of The Florida Bar, Rule 1-102(A)(4) (engaging in conduct involving fraud, misrepresentation, dishonesty and deceit), and Rule 1-102(A)(6) (conduct reflecting adversely on fitness to practice law), by failing to return his 5V2 year-old daughter to his former wife and the child’s mother, contrary to a court-ordered child visitation order; (2) respondent violated The Florida Bar’s Code of Professional Responsibility Rule 1-102(A)(6) (conduct reflecting adversely on fitness to practice law), and Rule 7-101(A)(2) (failing to carry out a contract for professional services), by abandoning his law practice and neglecting a client’s divorce case without notifying the client; and (3) respondent violated The Florida Bar’s Code of Professional Responsibility Rule 1-102(A)(6) (conduct reflecting adversely on fitness to practice law), and Rule 9-102(B)(4) (failing to promptly pay or deliver funds which a client is entitled to receive), by withholding a brokerage commission fee from a real estate salesman and withdrawing attorney’s fees from an escrow account without authorization.

[1037]*1037In accordance with respondent’s conditional guilty plea for consent judgment, the referee recommended a six-months’ suspension, retroactive to three months from the date of this opinion, with proof of his rehabilitation being required prior to readmission in accordance with Rule 3-5.1(e), Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. We accept the plea, approve the referee’s report, and impose the recommended discipline. Judgment for costs in the amount of $740.66 is hereby entered against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

506 So. 2d 1036, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 230, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 1857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-shannon-fla-1987.