Florida Bar v. Saphirstein

456 So. 2d 893, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 428, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3425
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 27, 1984
DocketNo. 65404
StatusPublished

This text of 456 So. 2d 893 (Florida Bar v. Saphirstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Florida Bar v. Saphirstein, 456 So. 2d 893, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 428, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3425 (Fla. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the Court on amended petition to approve conditional guilty plea to violations of Disciplinary Rules 2-110(A) and 6-101(A)(3) of The Flor-ida Bar Code of Professional Responsibility. We approve the amended petition, and we hereby reprimand respondent, Arnold Saphirstein, for these violations. The publication of this order in Southern Reporter shall serve as respondent’s public reprimand.

Costs in the amount of $213.25 are hereby taxed against the respondent.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD and EHRLICH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
456 So. 2d 893, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 428, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-saphirstein-fla-1984.