Florida Bar v. Rodriguez
This text of 465 So. 2d 530 (Florida Bar v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon a conditional guilty plea for consent judgment by respondent this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Rodriguez’ alleged misconduct. Rodriguez acknowledged his violation of article XI, Rules 11.02(2), 11.02(3)(a), 11.-02(4) and Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(1), 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(6), 9-102(A) and 9-102(B)(4). The referee recommended that Rodriguez be found guilty in accordance with his conditional plea and that he be given a public reprimand.
Neither side contests the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter will serve as the public reprimand.
Judgment for costs in the amount of $1,048.55 is hereby entered against respondent, for which let execution issue.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
465 So. 2d 530, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-rodriguez-fla-1985.