Florida Bar v. Poe

456 So. 2d 892, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 420, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3410
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 20, 1984
DocketNo. 64812
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 456 So. 2d 892 (Florida Bar v. Poe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Florida Bar v. Poe, 456 So. 2d 892, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 420, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3410 (Fla. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before the Court on the respondent’s conditional guilty plea to violations of article XI, Rules 11.02(3)(a), 11.-02(4) and 11.02(4)(c) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, and Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(4), 6-101(A)(2), 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(1), 7-101(A)(2), and 9-102(B)(3) of the Code of Professional Responsibility of The Florida Bar. We approve the conditional guilty plea, and, in accordance with the plea, publicly reprimand the respondent, direct that he be placed on two years’ probation, and require that he submit quarterly caseload reports to The Florida Bar.

The respondent shall appear before the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar for a public reprimand and this opinion shall be published in Southern Reporter.

Costs in the amount of $1,021.33 are assessed against the respondent.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, Acting C.J., and ALDERMAN, McDonald, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Florida Bar v. Poe
786 So. 2d 1164 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
CONTINENTAL VIDEO CORPORATION v. Honeywell, Inc.
456 So. 2d 892 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
456 So. 2d 892, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 420, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-poe-fla-1984.