Florida Bar v. Poe

456 So. 2d 892, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 420, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3410
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 20, 1984·No. No. 64812·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before the Court on the respondent’s conditional guilty plea to violations of article XI, Rules 11.02(3)(a), 11.-02(4) and 11.02(4)(c) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, and Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(4), 6-101(A)(2), 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(1), 7-101(A)(2), and 9-102(B)(3) of the Code of Professional Responsibility of The Florida Bar. We approve the conditional guilty plea, and, in accordance with the plea, publicly reprimand the respondent, direct that he be placed on two years’ probation, and require that he submit quarterly caseload reports to The Florida Bar.

The respondent shall appear before the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar for a public reprimand and this opinion shall be published in Southern Reporter.

Costs in the amount of $1,021.33 are assessed against the respondent.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, Acting C.J., and ALDERMAN, McDonald, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida Bar v. Poe, 456 So. 2d 892, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 420, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3410 (Fla. 1984).

456 So. 2d 892 (Florida Bar v. Poe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Bar v. Poe
786 So. 2d 1164 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
CONTINENTAL VIDEO CORPORATION v. Honeywell, Inc.
456 So. 2d 892 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)