Florida Bar v. Page
This text of 475 So. 2d 1236 (Florida Bar v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Florida Bar filed a complaint against Page, a member of the bar, charging numerous violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility. After a hearing, the referee recommended that Page be found guilty of violating disciplinary rules 6-101(A)(2) (handling a legal matter without adequate preparation), 6-101(A)(3) (neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him), and 7-101(A)(l) (failing to seek client’s lawful objectives through reasonably available means permitted by law). Taking into account Page’s prior disciplinary history,
After studying this case, we find that Page should be disbarred because of his cumulative misconduct. We also adopt the referee’s recommendation that Page not be considered for readmission until he has shown rehabilitation, compliance with the order to show cause referred to in The Florida Bar v. Page, 419 So.2d 332 (Fla. [1237]*12371982), and successful completion of the bar exam. Because Page has been under a still-current suspension for the last four years, we order that his name be stricken immediately from the roll of attorneys permitted to practice law in Florida. Judgment for costs in the amount of $726.92 is hereby entered against Page, for which sum let execution issue.
It is so ordered.
The Florida Bar v. Page, 419 So.2d 332 (Fla.1982); The Florida Bar v. Page, 381 So.2d 1357 (Fla.1980).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
475 So. 2d 1236, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 493, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-page-fla-1985.