Florida Bar v. Padgett

529 So. 2d 1099
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedAugust 18, 1988
DocketNos. 70586, 70933
StatusPublished

This text of 529 So. 2d 1099 (Florida Bar v. Padgett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Florida Bar v. Padgett, 529 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding is before the Court for consideration of the report of the referee. The referee’s findings and recommendations are not contested before this Court.

In case no. 70,586, the referee found that respondent Kenneth E. Padgett misappropriated funds that had been entrusted to him in connection with the administration of a guardianship. Respondent was convicted of grand theft based on his conduct in the matter. As recommended by the referee, the facts support finding respondent guilty of violating numerous provisions of the former Integration Rule and Code of Professional Responsibility.

In case no. 70,933, the referee found that respondent misappropriated funds that had been entrusted to him in connection with the administration of an estate. Again, the referee recommended finding respondent guilty of numerous rules violations.

Respondent has been disciplined twice previously for misconduct in connection with trust account or trust fund administration

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The Florida Bar v. Padgett
481 So. 2d 919 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Florida Bar v. Padgett
501 So. 2d 593 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
529 So. 2d 1099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-padgett-fla-1988.