Florida Bar v. Padgett
Opinion
This disciplinary proceeding is before the Court for consideration of the report of the referee. The referee’s findings and recommendations are not contested before this Court.
In case no. 70,586, the referee found that respondent Kenneth E. Padgett misappropriated funds that had been entrusted to him in connection with the administration of a guardianship. Respondent was convicted of grand theft based on his conduct in the matter. As recommended by the referee, the facts support finding respondent guilty of violating numerous provisions of the former Integration Rule and Code of Professional Responsibility.
In case no. 70,933, the referee found that respondent misappropriated funds that had been entrusted to him in connection with the administration of an estate. Again, the referee recommended finding respondent guilty of numerous rules violations.
Respondent has been disciplined twice previously for misconduct in connection with trust account or trust fund administration
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
529 So. 2d 1099 (Florida Bar v. Padgett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.