Florida Bar v. Ollinger

Supreme Court of Florida

Florida Bar v. Ollinger

478 So. 2d 1068, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 619, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 4141

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedNovember 25, 1985

DocketNo. 66824

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 478 So. 2d 1068 (Florida Bar v. Ollinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida Bar v. Ollinger, 478 So. 2d 1068, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 619, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 4141 (Fla. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a complaint by The Florida Bar this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Ollinger’s alleged misconduct. Ollinger tendered a guilty plea for consent judgment

* acknowledging his violation of Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(1) and 3-104(C) and (D) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The referee recommended that Ollinger be found guilty in accordance with his plea with the proviso that The Florida Bar will not be estopped from seeking further disciplinary sanctions against respondent should a grievance committee of The Florida Bar make a finding of probable cause based upon the results of the audit of respondent’s trust accounts and that he be given a public reprimand.

Neither side contest the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter will serve as the public reprimand.

Judgment for costs in the amount of $492.00 is hereby entered against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

We feel it unnecessary to publish the full text of the plea. The Court file is open for inspection.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon a complaint by The Florida Bar this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Ollinger’s alleged misconduct. Ollinger tendered a guilty plea for consent judgment

* acknowledging his violation of Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(1) and 3-104(C) and (D) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The referee recommended that Ollinger be found guilty in accordance with his plea with the proviso that The Florida Bar will not be estopped from seeking further disciplinary sanctions against respondent should a grievance committee of The Florida Bar make a finding of probable cause based upon the results of the audit of respondent’s trust accounts and that he be given a public reprimand.

Neither side contest the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter will serve as the public reprimand.

Judgment for costs in the amount of $492.00 is hereby entered against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

We feel it unnecessary to publish the full text of the plea. The Court file is open for inspection.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

478 So. 2d 1068, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 619, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 4141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-ollinger-fla-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack