Florida Bar v. Ollinger

478 So. 2d 1068, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 619, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 4141
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 25, 1985·No. No. 66824·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a complaint by The Florida Bar this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Ollinger’s alleged misconduct. Ollinger tendered a guilty plea for consent judgment * acknowledging his violation of Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(1) and 3-104(C) and (D) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The referee recommended that Ollinger be found guilty in accordance with his plea with the proviso that The Florida Bar will not be estopped from seeking further disciplinary sanctions against respondent should a grievance committee of The Florida Bar make a finding of probable cause based upon the results of the audit of respondent’s trust accounts and that he be given a public reprimand.

Neither side contest the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter will serve as the public reprimand.

Judgment for costs in the amount of $492.00 is hereby entered against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida Bar v. Ollinger, 478 So. 2d 1068, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 619, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 4141 (Fla. 1985).

478 So. 2d 1068 (Florida Bar v. Ollinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Bar v. Ollinger
489 So. 2d 726 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Maryland Cas. Co. v. Reliance Ins. Co.
478 So. 2d 1068 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)