Florida Bar v. Oberhausen

453 So. 2d 807, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3272
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 19, 1984
DocketNo. 64273
StatusPublished

This text of 453 So. 2d 807 (Florida Bar v. Oberhausen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Florida Bar v. Oberhausen, 453 So. 2d 807, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3272 (Fla. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding by The Florida Bar against Frank C. Oberhausen, Jr., a member of The Florida Bar, is presently before us on complaint of The Florida Bar and report of referee. Pursuant to article XI, Rule 11.06(9)(b) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, the referee’s report and record were duly filed with this Court. No petition for review pursuant to Integration Rule of The Florida Bar 11.09(1) has been filed.

Having considered the pleadings and evidence, the referee recommended that respondent be found guilty and specifically he be found guilty of violating the following Disciplinary Rules of The Florida Bar’s Code of Professional Responsibility: 6-101(A)(3) for neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him for failing to withdraw and leaving the case unattended and 9-102(B)(3) for failing to promptly render an appropriate accounting of the remaining funds to his client through Mr. Wallach, or directly, and to refund the unused portion for almost two years until after the grievance committee hearing. The referee also recommends that respondent be found guilty of violating article XI, Rule 11.02(4) of The Florida Bar’s Integration Rule with respect to failing to promptly account to his client for the funds through Mr. Wal-lach, or directly, and to refund the unused portion for almost two years until after the grievance committee hearing.

The referee recommends that respondent receive a public reprimand without a personal appearance before the Supreme Court, the Board of Governors or the referee.

Having carefully reviewed the record, we approve the findings and recommendations of the referee.

[808]*808Publication of this opinion m Southern Reporter will serve as the public reprimand.

Costs in the amount of $1,278.64 are hereby taxed against respondent.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
453 So. 2d 807, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-oberhausen-fla-1984.