Florida Bar v. Napier

Supreme Court of Florida

Florida Bar v. Napier

467 So. 2d 994, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 233, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3020

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 18, 1985·No. No. 65338·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a complaint by The Florida Bar this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Napier’s alleged misconduct. Napier tendered a conditional guilty plea for consent judgment, acknowledging his violation of article XI, Rule 11.02(4) of the Integration Rule, Bylaws section 11.-02(4)(c) and Disciplinary Rules 6-101(A)(3), 7-102(A)(5), 9-102(A), 9-102(B)(3) and 9-102(B)(4). The referee recommended that Napier be found guilty in accordance with his conditional plea and that he be given a public reprimand without appearance before the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar and payment of costs.

Neither side contests the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter will serve as the public reprimand.

Judgment for costs in the amount of $914.37 is hereby entered against respondent, for which let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, A.C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon a complaint by The Florida Bar this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Napier’s alleged misconduct. Napier tendered a conditional guilty plea for consent judgment, acknowledging his violation of article XI, Rule 11.02(4) of the Integration Rule, Bylaws section 11.-02(4)(c) and Disciplinary Rules 6-101(A)(3), 7-102(A)(5), 9-102(A), 9-102(B)(3) and 9-102(B)(4). The referee recommended that Napier be found guilty in accordance with his conditional plea and that he be given a public reprimand without appearance before the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar and payment of costs.

Neither side contests the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter will serve as the public reprimand.

Judgment for costs in the amount of $914.37 is hereby entered against respondent, for which let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, A.C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Florida Bar v. Napier, 467 So. 2d 994, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 233, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3020 (Fla. 1985).

Pincite

467 So. 2d 994 (Florida Bar v. Napier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related