Florida Bar v. Napier
This text of 467 So. 2d 994 (Florida Bar v. Napier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon a complaint by The Florida Bar this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Napier’s alleged misconduct. Napier tendered a conditional guilty plea for consent judgment, acknowledging his violation of article XI, Rule 11.02(4) of the Integration Rule, Bylaws section 11.-02(4)(c) and Disciplinary Rules 6-101(A)(3), 7-102(A)(5), 9-102(A), 9-102(B)(3) and 9-102(B)(4). The referee recommended that Napier be found guilty in accordance with his conditional plea and that he be given a public reprimand without appearance before the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar and payment of costs.
Neither side contests the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter will serve as the public reprimand.
Judgment for costs in the amount of $914.37 is hereby entered against respondent, for which let execution issue.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
467 So. 2d 994, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 233, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-napier-fla-1985.