Florida Bar v. Merwin

Supreme Court of Florida

Florida Bar v. Merwin

384 So. 2d 33, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4237

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 15, 1980·No. No. 58709·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the Court on Petition for Approval of Conditional Guilty Plea to violations of rule 11.02(3)(a) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar and Disciplinary Rules 1 ■ 102(A)(4) and 1-102(A)(6) of the Code of Professional Responsibility of The Florida Bar. We approve the Petition, and we hereby reprimand Respondent, William Richard Merwin, for these violations. The publication of this order in Southern Reporter shall serve as Respondent’s public reprimand.

Costs in the amount of $257.31 are hereby taxed against the Respondent, payable within 90 days of the Court’s order.

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the Court on Petition for Approval of Conditional Guilty Plea to violations of rule 11.02(3)(a) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar and Disciplinary Rules 1 ■ 102(A)(4) and 1-102(A)(6) of the Code of Professional Responsibility of The Florida Bar. We approve the Petition, and we hereby reprimand Respondent, William Richard Merwin, for these violations. The publication of this order in Southern Reporter shall serve as Respondent’s public reprimand.

Costs in the amount of $257.31 are hereby taxed against the Respondent, payable within 90 days of the Court’s order.

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

Florida Bar v. Merwin, 384 So. 2d 33, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4237 (Fla. 1980).

Pincite

384 So. 2d 33 (Florida Bar v. Merwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related