Florida Bar v. Mayo

453 So. 2d 406, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3274
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 19, 1984
DocketNo. 65403
StatusPublished

This text of 453 So. 2d 406 (Florida Bar v. Mayo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Florida Bar v. Mayo, 453 So. 2d 406, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3274 (Fla. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mayo has tendered a conditional plea of guilty to violating Disciplinary Rule 9-102(B)(3) by failing to maintain complete records of funds and by failing to render an accounting for funds to a client. We approve the petition for approval of conditional guilty plea for consent judgment and entry of final order of discipline, and we hereby reprimand John N. Mayo. The publication of this order in Southern Reporter shall serve as Mayo’s public reprimand.

Costs in the amount of $175.00 are hereby taxed against Mayo.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
453 So. 2d 406, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-mayo-fla-1984.