Florida Bar v. Mattson

Supreme Court of Florida

Florida Bar v. Mattson

465 So. 2d 1234, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 173, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3170

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 14, 1985

DocketNo. 65778

StatusPublished

This text of 465 So. 2d 1234 (Florida Bar v. Mattson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida Bar v. Mattson, 465 So. 2d 1234, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 173, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3170 (Fla. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a complaint by The Florida Bar this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Mattson’s alleged misconduct. Mattson tendered a conditional guilty plea for consent judgment, acknowledging his violation of article XI, Rule 11.-02(3) of the Integration Rule and Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(5), 1-102(A)(6), 6~101(A)(2), 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(1), 7-101(A)(2), 7-101(A)(3) and 9-102(B)(4) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The referee recommended that Mattson be found guilty in accordance with his conditional plea, that he be disbarred for five years without leave to apply for readmission until passing the Bar examination, until all Client Security Fund payouts and assessed costs have been paid, and all valid claims of clients have been satisfied.

Neither side contests the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Keith K. Mattson is hereby disbarred from the practice of law for a period of five years effective nunc pro tunc February 18, 1983, without leave to apply for readmission until passing the Bar examination, until all Client Security Fund payouts and assessed costs have been paid, and all valid claims of clients have been satisfied.

Judgment for costs in the amount of $9,291.81 is hereby entered against respondent, for which let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, A.C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDonald and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon a complaint by The Florida Bar this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Mattson’s alleged misconduct. Mattson tendered a conditional guilty plea for consent judgment, acknowledging his violation of article XI, Rule 11.-02(3) of the Integration Rule and Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(5), 1-102(A)(6), 6~101(A)(2), 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(1), 7-101(A)(2), 7-101(A)(3) and 9-102(B)(4) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The referee recommended that Mattson be found guilty in accordance with his conditional plea, that he be disbarred for five years without leave to apply for readmission until passing the Bar examination, until all Client Security Fund payouts and assessed costs have been paid, and all valid claims of clients have been satisfied.

Neither side contests the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Keith K. Mattson is hereby disbarred from the practice of law for a period of five years effective nunc pro tunc February 18, 1983, without leave to apply for readmission until passing the Bar examination, until all Client Security Fund payouts and assessed costs have been paid, and all valid claims of clients have been satisfied.

Judgment for costs in the amount of $9,291.81 is hereby entered against respondent, for which let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, A.C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDonald and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

465 So. 2d 1234, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 173, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-mattson-fla-1985.