Florida Bar v. Lund

410 So. 2d 922, 1982 Fla. LEXIS 2361
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 25, 1982·No. No. 60432·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this disciplinary proceeding the referee has recommended that the respondent, a member of the Florida Bar, be found guilty of violation of the Florida Bar Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rules 1-102(AX1), 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(5), and 1-102(A)(6).*

[923] The complaint arises from testimony that the respondent had given before a grievance committee hearing. The respondent admits that a small portion of his testimony turned out to be untrue, but that he was unaware of its untruthfulness and that there was no intentional misrepresentation. He urges this Court that the referee’s findings of fact do not support a conclusion of a violation of any disciplinary rule.

We reject that contention and approve the referee’s report. We also adopt the referee’s recommendation of discipline and suspend John Larson Lund for a period of ten days. The suspension shall be effective March 29, 1982, thereby giving respondent time to close out his practice and take the necessary steps to protect his clients, and it is ordered that respondent shall not accept any new business. He is further directed to pay costs in the sum of $684.20 to the Florida Bar.

It is so ordered.

SUNDBERG, C. J., and ADKINS, OVER-TON and McDONALD, JJ., concur. BOYD, J., dissents.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida Bar v. Lund, 410 So. 2d 922, 1982 Fla. LEXIS 2361 (Fla. 1982).

410 So. 2d 922 (Florida Bar v. Lund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The Florida Bar v. Tobkin
944 So. 2d 219 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)
The Florida Bar v. Glick
693 So. 2d 550 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)