Florida Bar v. Hazen
This text of 445 So. 2d 341 (Florida Bar v. Hazen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Florida Bar filed an eight-count complaint against Hazen, charging him with violating Florida Bar Integration Rule, article XI, Rule 11.02(4) and DR 9-102(A). The referee appointed by this Court held a hearing, at which time the bar dismissed three of the counts. The referee recommends that Hazen be found not guilty of two of the counts and that he be found guilty of the remaining three counts. As to discipline, the referee recommends that Hazen be suspended for six months from the date of his initial temporary suspension (February 15, 1982)
Neither Hazen nor the bar has petitioned for review of the referee’s report and recommendations. We have examined the record and adopt both the report and the recommended penalty. Costs in the amount of $3,883.57 are hereby taxed against Hazen.
It is so ordered.
The period of suspension, therefore, has already expired. We note, however, that the temporary suspension has never been lifted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
445 So. 2d 341, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 2597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-hazen-fla-1984.