Florida Bar v. Hayden

Supreme Court of Florida

Florida Bar v. Hayden

490 So. 2d 940, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 303, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2316

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJuly 3, 1986

DocketNos. 66011, 68331

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 490 So. 2d 940 (Florida Bar v. Hayden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida Bar v. Hayden, 490 So. 2d 940, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 303, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2316 (Fla. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding is presently before us on complaints of The Florida Bar and the report of the referee. Neither respondent nor The Florida Bar contests the report. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla.Const.

Respondent tendered a guilty plea for a consent judgment admitting his violations of Disciplinary Rules 9-102(A) and 9-102(B)(2). The referee accepted the plea and recommended that respondent be suspended for thirty days beginning August 1, 1986, and pay all costs. We approve the referee’s findings and recommendations.

Accordingly, respondent shall be suspended from the practice of law for thirty days, effective August 1, 1986.

Judgment for costs in the amount of $7,863.86 is hereby entered against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and ADKINS, OVER-TON, EHRLICH and BARKETT, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI