Florida Bar v. Hamrick

Supreme Court of Florida

Florida Bar v. Hamrick

478 So. 2d 814, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 604, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 4043

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedNovember 14, 1985

DocketNo. 65879

StatusPublished

This text of 478 So. 2d 814 (Florida Bar v. Hamrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida Bar v. Hamrick, 478 So. 2d 814, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 604, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 4043 (Fla. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Bar charged Hamrick, a member of the bar, with violating discipli[815]*815nary rules 6-101(A)(3) (neglect of a legal matter) and 7-101(A)(l) (failure to seek the legal objectives of a client). Following a hearing on the matter, the referee recommended that Hamrick be found guilty of the above-listed charges and that he be given a public reprimand.

After reviewing the record, we agree with the referee’s recommendations. We therefore find Richard D. Hamrick guilty of violating disciplinary rules 6-101(A)(3) and 7-101(A)(l). Publication of this opinion in the Southern Reporter will serve as his public reprimand. Judgment for costs in the amount of $916.33 is hereby entered against Hamrick, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Bar charged Hamrick, a member of the bar, with violating discipli[815]*815nary rules 6-101(A)(3) (neglect of a legal matter) and 7-101(A)(l) (failure to seek the legal objectives of a client). Following a hearing on the matter, the referee recommended that Hamrick be found guilty of the above-listed charges and that he be given a public reprimand.

After reviewing the record, we agree with the referee’s recommendations. We therefore find Richard D. Hamrick guilty of violating disciplinary rules 6-101(A)(3) and 7-101(A)(l). Publication of this opinion in the Southern Reporter will serve as his public reprimand. Judgment for costs in the amount of $916.33 is hereby entered against Hamrick, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

478 So. 2d 814, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 604, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 4043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-hamrick-fla-1985.