Florida Bar v. Gifford

478 So. 2d 46, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 591, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 4019
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 31, 1985·No. No. 66038·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding is before us on the complaint of The Florida Bar and the report of the referee. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

The referee recommended that respondent be found guilty of violating The Florida Bar Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(5), 7-106(A), and 7-106(C)(7), and receive a public reprimand, for knowingly and willfully violating a court order that expressly directed him not to make reference to certain proffered evidence in presenting his argument to the jury, and for being found in direct criminal contempt for his disregard of the judge’s ruling.

We approve the referee’s findings and recommendation. The publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter shall serve as respondent’s public reprimand. Costs in the amount of $1,200.50 are hereby taxed against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, A.C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida Bar v. Gifford, 478 So. 2d 46, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 591, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 4019 (Fla. 1985).

478 So. 2d 46 (Florida Bar v. Gifford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The Florida Bar v. Taylor
648 So. 2d 709 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)