Florida Bar v. Gifford

Supreme Court of Florida

Florida Bar v. Gifford

478 So. 2d 46, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 591, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 4019

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedOctober 31, 1985

DocketNo. 66038

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 478 So. 2d 46 (Florida Bar v. Gifford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida Bar v. Gifford, 478 So. 2d 46, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 591, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 4019 (Fla. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding is before us on the complaint of The Florida Bar and the report of the referee. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

The referee recommended that respondent be found guilty of violating The Florida Bar Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(5), 7-106(A), and 7-106(C)(7), and receive a public reprimand, for knowingly and willfully violating a court order that expressly directed him not to make reference to certain proffered evidence in presenting his argument to the jury, and for being found in direct criminal contempt for his disregard of the judge’s ruling.

We approve the referee’s findings and recommendation. The publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter shall serve as respondent’s public reprimand. Costs in the amount of $1,200.50 are hereby taxed against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, A.C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI