Florida Bar v. Fogarty

Supreme Court of Florida

Florida Bar v. Fogarty

485 So. 2d 416, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 132, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 1796

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 27, 1986

DocketNo. 68115

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 485 So. 2d 416 (Florida Bar v. Fogarty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida Bar v. Fogarty, 485 So. 2d 416, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 132, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 1796 (Fla. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the filing of the Unconditional Guilty Plea and Consent Judgment for Discipline this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Fogarty’s alleged misconduct. The unconditional plea for consent judgment,

* acknowledges his violation of Florida Bar Code of Profession- . al Responsibility, Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(1), (4), (5) and (6), and 6-101(A)(3). The referee recommended that Fogarty be found guilty in accordance with his unconditional plea and that he be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six (6) months and continuing thereafter until proof of rehabilitation; and further that respondent shall refund legal fees in the amount of Two Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($2,000.00) to his former client, Vickie L. Bennett.

Neither side contests the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Accordingly, Brian J. Fogarty is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of six (6) months effective thirty (30) days from the filing of this opinion and continuing thereafter until proof of rehabilitation; and further is directed to refund legal fees in the amount of Two Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($2,000.00) to his former client, Vickie L. Bennett.

Judgment for costs in the amount of $521.23 is hereby entered against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

[417]*417ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

We feel it unnecessary to publish the full text of the plea. The Court file is open for inspection.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon the filing of the Unconditional Guilty Plea and Consent Judgment for Discipline this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Fogarty’s alleged misconduct. The unconditional plea for consent judgment,

* acknowledges his violation of Florida Bar Code of Profession- . al Responsibility, Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(1), (4), (5) and (6), and 6-101(A)(3). The referee recommended that Fogarty be found guilty in accordance with his unconditional plea and that he be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six (6) months and continuing thereafter until proof of rehabilitation; and further that respondent shall refund legal fees in the amount of Two Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($2,000.00) to his former client, Vickie L. Bennett.

Neither side contests the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Accordingly, Brian J. Fogarty is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of six (6) months effective thirty (30) days from the filing of this opinion and continuing thereafter until proof of rehabilitation; and further is directed to refund legal fees in the amount of Two Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($2,000.00) to his former client, Vickie L. Bennett.

Judgment for costs in the amount of $521.23 is hereby entered against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

[417]*417ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

We feel it unnecessary to publish the full text of the plea. The Court file is open for inspection.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

485 So. 2d 416, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 132, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 1796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-fogarty-fla-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack