Florida Bar v. Ethier

Supreme Court of Florida

Florida Bar v. Ethier

411 So. 2d 872, 1982 Fla. LEXIS 2376

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 11, 1982

DocketNo. 60284

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 411 So. 2d 872 (Florida Bar v. Ethier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida Bar v. Ethier, 411 So. 2d 872, 1982 Fla. LEXIS 2376 (Fla. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this bar grievance proceeding the referee found Ethier had violated Florida Bar Integration Rule, article XI, Rule 11.-02(3)(a). The referee recommended, inter alia, that Ethier be given a thirty day suspension from the practice of law. Neither party has appealed the referee’s report. After having carefully reviewed the record, we approve the findings of the referee and hereby suspend Eugene J. Ethier from the practice of law for a period of thirty days, effective April 12, 1982, thereby giving respondent time to close out his practice and take the necessary steps to protect his clients. Respondent shall not accept any new business.

Costs in the amount of $945.80 are taxed against the respondent.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, A. C. J., and BOYD, OVER-TON, ALDERMAN and EHRLICH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this bar grievance proceeding the referee found Ethier had violated Florida Bar Integration Rule, article XI, Rule 11.-02(3)(a). The referee recommended, inter alia, that Ethier be given a thirty day suspension from the practice of law. Neither party has appealed the referee’s report. After having carefully reviewed the record, we approve the findings of the referee and hereby suspend Eugene J. Ethier from the practice of law for a period of thirty days, effective April 12, 1982, thereby giving respondent time to close out his practice and take the necessary steps to protect his clients. Respondent shall not accept any new business.

Costs in the amount of $945.80 are taxed against the respondent.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, A. C. J., and BOYD, OVER-TON, ALDERMAN and EHRLICH, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

411 So. 2d 872, 1982 Fla. LEXIS 2376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-ethier-fla-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack