Florida Bar v. Davis

530 So. 2d 300, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 551, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 974, 1988 WL 93745

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Florida Bar v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 258 →

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 8, 1988·No. No. 71503·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Bar brought this disciplinary action against Adelaide E. Davis. A referee was appointed whose report is now before us for consideration. No petition for review has been filed.

The referee’s report recites detailed findings of fact. The referee recommends that respondent be found not guilty of the misconduct charged.

We approve the referee’s report and adopt the findings and recommendations therein as the judgment of this Court. Respondent is adjudged not guilty.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Bar brought this disciplinary action against Adelaide E. Davis. A referee was appointed whose report is now before us for consideration. No petition for review has been filed.

The referee’s report recites detailed findings of fact. The referee recommends that respondent be found not guilty of the misconduct charged.

We approve the referee’s report and adopt the findings and recommendations therein as the judgment of this Court. Respondent is adjudged not guilty.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Florida Bar v. Davis, 530 So. 2d 300, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 551, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 974, 1988 WL 93745 (Fla. 1988).

Pincite

530 So. 2d 300 (Florida Bar v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.