Florida Bar v. Danton

158 So. 2d 133
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 4, 1963
DocketNo. 32991
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 158 So. 2d 133 (Florida Bar v. Danton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Florida Bar v. Danton, 158 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By letter Daniel Danton requested leave to resign from The Florida Bar, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 11.09, Article XI of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, 31 F.S.A.

The referee, after notice and hearing, filed his report finding that the resignation is in accordance with the requirements of Rule 11.09 and recommended that it be accepted.

Upon consideration, the Board of Governors approved and adopted the findings and recommendations of the referee and ordered that the petition of Daniel Danton to resign from The Florida Bar be accepted.

We have carefully examined the record and hereby affirm the order and judgment of the Board of Governors.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THORNAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reddick v. State
190 So. 2d 340 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 So. 2d 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-danton-fla-1963.