Florida Bar v. Chosid
Opinions
This disciplinary proceeding is before us on complaint of The Florida Bar and the report of the referee. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.
[151]*151The referee recommends that respondent be found guilty of violating article XI, Rule 11.02 of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, and Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(1), 1-102(A)(3), 1-102(A)(4), and 1-102(A)(6) of The Florida Bar Code of Professional Responsibility. These violations arose from respondent’s guilty plea to the felony charge of making and subscribing a false income tax return. The referee recommended a three-year suspension, beginning November 1, 1984, and thereafter until respondent proves his rehabilitation. The Bar contends that the disciplinary sanction should be disbarment for a period of three years from April 24, 1985, the effective date of respondent’s felony conviction.
We approve the referee’s report, but find that, under these circumstances, the discipline must be a three-year suspension beginning April 24, 1985, and thereafter until respondent proves his rehabilitation. Judgment for costs in the amount of $365.53 is hereby entered against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
500 So. 2d 150 (Florida Bar v. Chosid) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.