Florida Bar v. Casety

499 So. 2d 831, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 61, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 3012
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 30, 1986·No. No. 68026·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Bar brought this disciplinary action against Harold E. Casety, Jr., a member of the Florida Bar, in response to his guilty pleas in California to voluntary manslaughter and personal use of a firearm. As a result of those pleas, Casety received a six-year prison term. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 15, Florida Constitution. The referee recommended that Casety be found guilty of violating disciplinary rules 1-102(A)(1) (violating a disciplinary rule), 1-102(A)(3) (illegal conduct involving moral turpitude), and 1-102(A)(6) (conduct adversely reflecting upon fitness to practice law), as well as article XI, rule 11.02(3)(a) (conduct contrary to honesty, justice, or good morals) of the integration rule. In light of these findings the referee recommended that Casety be disbarred from the practice of law in this jurisdiction. We adopt the uncontested

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida Bar v. Casety, 499 So. 2d 831, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 61, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 3012 (Fla. 1986).

499 So. 2d 831 (Florida Bar v. Casety) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Antel v. DEPARTMENT OF PRO. REGULATION
522 So. 2d 1056 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)