Florida Bar v. Camp

Supreme Court of Florida

Florida Bar v. Camp

626 So. 2d 691, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 584, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1764, 1993 WL 444301

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedNovember 4, 1993

DocketNo. 80591

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 626 So. 2d 691 (Florida Bar v. Camp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida Bar v. Camp, 626 So. 2d 691, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 584, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1764, 1993 WL 444301 (Fla. 1993).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER

The uncontested report of the referee is approved, and the respondent is suspended for three years, effective nunc pro tunc August 11, 1992, which was the date of this Court’s Order of Emergency Suspension. The respondent shall not be reinstated until he proves rehabilitation pursuant to rule 3-7.10 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. We further approve the recommendation of the referee that paragraph three of this Court’s August 11, 1992, order be dissolved to the extent that it prohibits the respondent from receiving his last severance paycheck from the Bateman Graham Law Firm. Respondent is further directed to comply with all terms and conditions of the referee’s report.

Judgment for costs in the amount of $5,072.06 is hereby entered against the respondent, for which sum let execution issue.

Not final until time expires to file motion for rehearing and, if filed, determined.

OVERTON, MCDONALD, GRIMES and HARDING, JJ., concur. KOGAN, J., dissents with an opinion, in which BARKETT, C.J. and SHAW, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The uncontested report of the referee is approved, and the respondent is suspended for three years, effective nunc pro tunc August 11, 1992, which was the date of this Court’s Order of Emergency Suspension. The respondent shall not be reinstated until he proves rehabilitation pursuant to rule 3-7.10 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. We further approve the recommendation of the referee that paragraph three of this Court’s August 11, 1992, order be dissolved to the extent that it prohibits the respondent from receiving his last severance paycheck from the Bateman Graham Law Firm. Respondent is further directed to comply with all terms and conditions of the referee’s report.

Judgment for costs in the amount of $5,072.06 is hereby entered against the respondent, for which sum let execution issue.

Not final until time expires to file motion for rehearing and, if filed, determined.

OVERTON, MCDONALD, GRIMES and HARDING, JJ., concur. KOGAN, J., dissents with an opinion, in which BARKETT, C.J. and SHAW, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

626 So. 2d 691, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 584, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1764, 1993 WL 444301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-camp-fla-1993.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack