Florida Bar v. Callahan, Hart, Danforth & Cummings

Supreme Court of Florida

Florida Bar v. Callahan, Hart, Danforth & Cummings

478 So. 2d 37, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 590, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 4014

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedOctober 31, 1985

DocketNo. 63521

StatusPublished

This text of 478 So. 2d 37 (Florida Bar v. Callahan, Hart, Danforth & Cummings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida Bar v. Callahan, Hart, Danforth & Cummings, 478 So. 2d 37, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 590, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 4014 (Fla. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This proceeding is before us on The Florida Bar’s motion for entry of a permanent injunction and the report of the referee.

The referee found that respondents have engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. Pursuant to the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, this Court has reviewed the referee's report, and agrees that respondents have engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. Accordingly, we approve the report of the referee and hereby enjoin respondents from engaging in the practice of law in the state of Florida unless and until such time as respondents are duly authorized to practice law in this state.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This proceeding is before us on The Florida Bar’s motion for entry of a permanent injunction and the report of the referee.

The referee found that respondents have engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. Pursuant to the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, this Court has reviewed the referee's report, and agrees that respondents have engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. Accordingly, we approve the report of the referee and hereby enjoin respondents from engaging in the practice of law in the state of Florida unless and until such time as respondents are duly authorized to practice law in this state.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

478 So. 2d 37, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 590, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 4014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-callahan-hart-danforth-cummings-fla-1985.