Florida Bar v. Brigman

299 So. 2d 7, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4804
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 31, 1974·No. No. 44998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Bar discipline proceeding, we review a «recommendation of the referee for a public reprimand of respondent for neglect in the handling of several matters in which he undertook representation. The referee found that respondent’s representation fell below the high standard required of an attorney in his professional conduct in representing clientSi The referee expressly found no dishonesty or mishandling of funds in any of these transactions. There is nothing in these proceedings that would justify detailing the several matters here. No response has been filed.

The findings and recommendations of the referee are hereby approved and this opinion shall constitute a public reprimand of respondent as recommended by the referee.

Execution is hereby directed to issue for costs against respondent in the amount of $599.60.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, DEKLE and OVERTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida Bar v. Brigman, 299 So. 2d 7, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4804 (Fla. 1974).

299 So. 2d 7 (Florida Bar v. Brigman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Bar v. Brigman
405 So. 2d 983 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)