Florida Bar v. Adamo

493 So. 2d 450, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 466, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2612
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 4, 1986
DocketNo. 68248
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 493 So. 2d 450 (Florida Bar v. Adamo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Florida Bar v. Adamo, 493 So. 2d 450, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 466, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2612 (Fla. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Bar brought this disciplinary action against Edmund A. Adamo, a member of the Florida Bar, for tampering with evidence, a third-degree felony, in violation of section 918.13(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1983). This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 15, Florida Constitution. After a hearing, the- referee recommended that Adamo be found guilty of violating disciplinary rules 1-102(A)(1) (violation of a disciplinary rule), 1-102(A)(3) (engaging in illegal conduct involving moral turpitude), 1-102(A)(4) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), and 1-102(A)(6) (conduct adversely reflecting on his fitness to practice law), as well as article XI, rules 11.02(3)(a) (conduct contrary to honesty, justice, or good morals) and 11.02(3)(b) (misconduct constituting a felony) of the integration rule. In light of these findings, the referee recommended that Adamo be disbarred from the practice of law in this jurisdiction effective November 26, 1985.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The Florida Bar v. Haimowitz
512 So. 2d 200 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
493 So. 2d 450, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 466, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-adamo-fla-1986.