Florida Attorney General v. Jimenez

180 So. 3d 248, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19463
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 2015·No. Nos. 3D15-2303, 3D15-2271·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION TO MODIFY OR VACATE STAY

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion to modify or vacate stay as applied to all pending red light cases is stricken on the basis that Appellant, Luis Torres Jimenez, lacks standing. Solares v. City of Miami, 166 So.3d 887, 888 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (“For a court of law operating as one of the three branches of government under the doctrine of the separation of powers, standing is a threshold issue which must be resolved before reaching the merits of a case. Before a court can consider whether an action is illegal, the court must be presented with a justiciable case or controversy between parties who have standing.”). This disposition is not a ruling on the merits of the motion.

Motion stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida Attorney General v. Jimenez, 180 So. 3d 248, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19463 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

180 So. 3d 248 (Florida Attorney General v. Jimenez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Solares v. City of Miami
166 So. 3d 887 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)