Florida Attorney General v. Jimenez
This text of 180 So. 3d 248 (Florida Attorney General v. Jimenez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON MOTION TO MODIFY OR VACATE STAY
Appellant’s motion to modify or vacate stay as applied to all pending red light cases is stricken on the basis that Appellant, Luis Torres Jimenez, lacks standing. Solares v. City of Miami, 166 So.3d 887, 888 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (“For a court of law operating as one of the three branches of government under the doctrine of the separation of powers, standing is a threshold issue which must be resolved before reaching the merits of a case. Before a court can consider whether an action is illegal, the court must be presented with a justiciable case or controversy between parties who have standing.”). This disposition is not a ruling on the merits of the motion.
Motion stricken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
180 So. 3d 248, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-attorney-general-v-jimenez-fladistctapp-2015.