Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Florida Atlantic Associates v. Belmont

Florida Atlantic Associates v. Belmont

464 So. 2d 659, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 575, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12802
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 6, 1985
DocketNo. 84-2353
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 464 So. 2d 659 (Florida Atlantic Associates v. Belmont) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Florida Atlantic Associates v. Belmont, 464 So. 2d 659, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 575, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12802 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Confident that the trial court is familiar with the premise that, in ruling on a motion under rule 1.280(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, in the context of discovery of net worth where an issue of punitive damages is involved, the trial judge may consider, among other things, “whether or not an actual factual basis exists for an award of punitive damages,” Tennant v. Charlton, 377 So.2d 1169 (Fla.1979), we deny the petition for writ of certiorari directed to an order limiting discovery in the lower court.

LETTS, HERSEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gentry v. State
464 So. 2d 659 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
464 So. 2d 659, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 575, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-atlantic-associates-v-belmont-fladistctapp-1985.