FLORIDA a & M UNIVERSITY v. Lewis

327 So. 2d 862
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 5, 1976
DocketX-371
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 327 So. 2d 862 (FLORIDA a & M UNIVERSITY v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
FLORIDA a & M UNIVERSITY v. Lewis, 327 So. 2d 862 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

327 So.2d 862 (1976)

FLORIDA A & M UNIVERSITY, an Institution Owned and Operated by the State of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
Althea M. LEWIS et al., Respondents.

No. X-371.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 5, 1976.
Rehearing Denied March 26, 1976.

Thomas F. Woods, Woods & Johnston, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Carol L. Reilly, Asst. Atty. Gen., and John E. Crusoe, Tallahassee, for respondents.

MILLS, Judge.

The University seeks review of an order of the Commission which changed the University's dismissal of its employee, Lewis, to a thirty-day suspension and reinstatement with full back pay. The issue before us is whether the Commission may determine that there was just cause for the dismissal of Lewis, but change the dismissal to a suspension.

Lewis was convicted of issuing two bad checks and sentenced to thirty days in the county jail. Because of this, the University dismissed Lewis on the ground of conduct unbecoming a public employee.

Lewis appealed to the Commission who changed the dismissal to a thirty-day suspension, because in its opinion the action of the University was too severe under the circumstances presented to it.

Sections 22A-7.10G.2 and 22A-7.10F.2 of Chapter 22A.7, Florida Administrative Rules, provide that an agency may dismiss or suspend an employee for just cause, which includes conduct unbecoming a public employee. The grounds for dismissal and suspension are the same. There is no guideline for determining when an agency must dismiss rather than suspend. Therefore, the agency has sole discretion to determine whether to dismiss or to suspend an employee, subject only to just cause. On appeal, the Commission may only determine whether there was competent substantial evidence to sustain the agency action or whether the facts establish just cause. State Department of Pollution Control v. State Career Service Commission (Hummel), 320 So.2d 846 (Fla.App. 1st, 1975).

*863 In the case before us, the Commission had to agree that just cause existed for the dismissal of Lewis, because otherwise there is no basis for the Commission's order of suspension. The Commission, finding no error in the action taken by the University, erred in ordering the suspension and reinstatement of Lewis with full back pay.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The order of the Commission is quashed, and the dismissal of Lewis by the University is reinstated.

BOYER, C.J., and McCORD, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. German
451 So. 2d 1013 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
School Board of Pinellas County v. Noble
384 So. 2d 205 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
SCH. BD. OF PINELLAS CTY. v. Noble
384 So. 2d 205 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Stewart v. Hilyer
376 So. 2d 727 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1979)
School Bd. of Pinellas County v. Noble
372 So. 2d 1111 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
City of Clearwater v. Garretson
355 So. 2d 1248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Collins v. FLORIDA DEPT. OF OFFENDER REHABILITATION
355 So. 2d 131 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
327 So. 2d 862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-a-m-university-v-lewis-fladistctapp-1976.