Florida A & M University Board of Trustees v. Thomas

19 So. 3d 445, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15612, 2009 WL 3316942
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 16, 2009·No. No. 5D09-1127·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari, contending that the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment constituted a departure from the essential requirements of law. It is petitioner’s position that respondent’s claim is barred by application of the sovereign immunity doctrine. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction to review this interlocutory order. See Dep’t of Education v. Roe, 679 So.2d 756 (Fla.1996); School Bd. of Miami-Dade County v. Leyva, 975 So.2d 576 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED.

MONACO, C.J., EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida A & M University Board of Trustees v. Thomas, 19 So. 3d 445, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15612, 2009 WL 3316942 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

19 So. 3d 445 (Florida A & M University Board of Trustees v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodriguez v. Miami-Dade County
117 So. 3d 400 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2013)
City of Freeport v. Beach Community Bank
108 So. 3d 684 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Miami-Dade County v. Rodriguez
67 So. 3d 1213 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Citizens Property Insurance Corp. v. San Perdido Ass'n
46 So. 3d 1051 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)