Floriano v. Endicott Supply Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Floriano v. Endicott Supply Co.

142 A. 920, 6 N.J. Misc. 681, 1928 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 164

DecidedJune 27, 1928

StatusPublished

This text of 142 A. 920 (Floriano v. Endicott Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Floriano v. Endicott Supply Co., 142 A. 920, 6 N.J. Misc. 681, 1928 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 164 (N.J. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a certiorari to review a judgment entered in the Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas, in a workmen’s compensation case, reversing an order in the workmen’s compensation bureau dismissing the petitioner’s petition. As we view the record only a factual question is involved. The reasons assigned for a reversal of the judgment are: The judgment is not supported by evidence and the death of petitioner’s decedent was not the result of an injury caused by an accident arising out of and in the course of the employment. No so. The petitioner or any of the alleged dependents were not partially dependent upon the decedent at the time of the alleged accident or death. Not so. Judge Bartlett’s review of the facts of the case in the Cumberland Court of Common Pleas is quite satisfactory. It would serve no useful purpose to make any further' or extended review of the facts. The judgment of the Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is a certiorari to review a judgment entered in the Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas, in a workmen’s compensation case, reversing an order in the workmen’s compensation bureau dismissing the petitioner’s petition. As we view the record only a factual question is involved. The reasons assigned for a reversal of the judgment are: The judgment is not supported by evidence and the death of petitioner’s decedent was not the result of an injury caused by an accident arising out of and in the course of the employment. No so. The petitioner or any of the alleged dependents were not partially dependent upon the decedent at the time of the alleged accident or death. Not so. Judge Bartlett’s review of the facts of the case in the Cumberland Court of Common Pleas is quite satisfactory. It would serve no useful purpose to make any further' or extended review of the facts. The judgment of the Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

142 A. 920, 6 N.J. Misc. 681, 1928 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floriano-v-endicott-supply-co-nj-1928.