Floriani v. Parmet

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Floriani v. Parmet

42 A.D.2d 728, 346 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3827

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 9, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 42 A.D.2d 728 (Floriani v. Parmet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Floriani v. Parmet, 42 A.D.2d 728, 346 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3827 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff Frances Floriani and for medical expenses, etc., incurred by her husband, plaintiffs appeal, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 5, 1972, in their favor, upon a jury verdict of $2,000 for Mrs. Floriani and $750 for Mr. Floriani. Judgment reversed, tm the- law, and new trial granted, on the issues of damages only, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 30 days after entry of the [729]*729order to be made hereon, defendant serves and files with the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to increase the verdict to $7,500 for plaintiff Frances Floriani and $1,500 for plaintiff Joseph Floriani and to the .entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith, in which event .the judgment, as so amended and increased, is affirmed, without costs. The appeal did not present questions of fact. The verdict was inadequate to the extent indicated herein. Munder, Acting P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff Frances Floriani and for medical expenses, etc., incurred by her husband, plaintiffs appeal, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 5, 1972, in their favor, upon a jury verdict of $2,000 for Mrs. Floriani and $750 for Mr. Floriani. Judgment reversed, tm the- law, and new trial granted, on the issues of damages only, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 30 days after entry of the [729]*729order to be made hereon, defendant serves and files with the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to increase the verdict to $7,500 for plaintiff Frances Floriani and $1,500 for plaintiff Joseph Floriani and to the .entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith, in which event .the judgment, as so amended and increased, is affirmed, without costs. The appeal did not present questions of fact. The verdict was inadequate to the extent indicated herein. Munder, Acting P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.2d 728, 346 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floriani-v-parmet-nyappdiv-1973.