Florez v. Territory of Arizona

128 P. 49, 14 Ariz. 343, 1912 Ariz. LEXIS 154
Arizona Supreme Court·Decided November 23, 1912·No. Criminal No. 317·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ROSS, J.

An inspection of the record on file in this court discloses that no legal or proper notice of appeal was given. There was an oral notice of appeal made in open court by appellant, hut that is not a compliance with the law. The notice of appeal must he in writing and filed with the clerk of the trial court. Penal Code, par. 1044. Such written notice is jurisdictional. Territory v. Hunter, 4 Ariz. 197, 36 Pac. 175.

The appeal is dismissed.

FRANKLIN, C. J., and CUNNINGHAM, J., coneur. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florez v. Territory of Arizona, 128 P. 49, 14 Ariz. 343, 1912 Ariz. LEXIS 154 (Ark. 1912).

128 P. 49 (Florez v. Territory of Arizona) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Johnson
277 P.2d 1020 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1954)