Flores v. State

235 S.W.2d 653, 155 Tex. Crim. 391, 1951 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1731
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 17, 1951
DocketNo. 25068
StatusPublished

This text of 235 S.W.2d 653 (Flores v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flores v. State, 235 S.W.2d 653, 155 Tex. Crim. 391, 1951 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1731 (Tex. 1951).

Opinion

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was indicted for robbery by assault and was by the jury convicted of an aggravated assault and given a penalty of a $1,000.00 fine and' confinement in the county jail for two years.

This indictment merely charges a simple assault and a robbery thereby. It contains none of the elements of an aggravated assault.

Under the case of Foreman v. State, 57 S.W. 843, on motion for a rehearing, it was held that a charge of robbery by assault with no allegations relative to the use of a deadly weapon, nor further description of the assault, such indictment did not include the elements of an aggravated assault. See Munson v. State, 21 Tex. App. 329, 17 S.W. 251; Huntsman v. State, 12 Tex. App. 619. This matter was fully discussed in the recent case of Tomlin v. State, 155 Texas Crim. Rep. 207; 233 S. W. (2d) 303.

[392]*392Upon the authority of that case, the judgment in the present instance will be reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tomlin v. State
233 S.W.2d 303 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1950)
Munson v. State
17 S.W. 251 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 S.W.2d 653, 155 Tex. Crim. 391, 1951 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flores-v-state-texcrimapp-1951.