Flores v. State

13 Tex. Ct. App. 337, 1883 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 10, 1883
DocketNos. 1357 and 1358
StatusPublished

This text of 13 Tex. Ct. App. 337 (Flores v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flores v. State, 13 Tex. Ct. App. 337, 1883 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1 (Tex. Ct. App. 1883).

Opinion

White, P. J.

Both these cases were prosecutions for theft of a horse. Each indictment is in the language of the form prescribed in “The Common Sense Indictment Bill” (General Laws Seventeenth Legislature, chap. 57, p. 60).

This particular form has been held to be fatally defective and unconstitutional. (Williams v. The State, 12 Texas Ct. App., 395.) Such being the case, the judgments rendered in the above styled causes will be reversed, and, because there is no valid indictments, these prosecutions must be dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Opinion delivered January 10, 1883.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Tex. Ct. App. 337, 1883 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flores-v-state-texapp-1883.