Flores v. State

58 So. 3d 437, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5635, 2011 WL 1485373
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 20, 2011·No. 4D10-1349·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order denying appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. The factual basis for the plea in this case did not establish actual possession of the firearm which is necessary for the three-year mandatory minimum to apply. Dawkins v. State, 923 So.2d 520 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); § 775.087(2)(a)l, Fla. Stat. (2001). The face of the record shows that appellant was in constructive, not actual, *438 possession of the firearm. We reverse and remand for the trial court to strike the mandatory minimum term from the sentence imposed on the possession of a firearm by a convicted felon count. Resen-tencing is not required, and appellant need not be present for this ministerial sentence correction.

Reverse and remand with directions to strike the three-year firearm mandatory minimum.

WARNER, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flores v. State, 58 So. 3d 437, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5635, 2011 WL 1485373 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

58 So. 3d 437 (Flores v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Christopher J. Porter v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2026
RAMON J. ROSARIO v. STATE OF FLORIDA
260 So. 3d 335 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
IRVINE HICKS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
227 So. 3d 135 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)