Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Flores v. State

Flores v. State

915 So. 2d 706, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18658, 2005 WL 3143451
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Flores v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 853 So. 2d 566 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 28, 2005·No. No. 1D05-2446·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying the motion, but do so without prejudice to appellant’s refiling his jail credit claim in a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion. See Burchfield v. State, 907 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005.)

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, WOLF, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flores v. State, 915 So. 2d 706, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18658, 2005 WL 3143451 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

915 So. 2d 706 (Flores v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burchfield v. State
907 So. 2d 614 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)