Flores v. State

93 So. 3d 324, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 413, 2012 WL 2035834, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 1130
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 7, 2012·No. No. SC10-2198·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in Flores v. State, 46 So.3d 102 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. LEWIS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flores v. State, 93 So. 3d 324, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 413, 2012 WL 2035834, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 1130 (Fla. 2012).

93 So. 3d 324 (Flores v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

St. Cyr v. State
106 So. 3d 487 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)