Flores v. State

577 F.3d 1014
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 13, 2009
Docket07-15603, 07-15605
StatusPublished

This text of 577 F.3d 1014 (Flores v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flores v. State, 577 F.3d 1014 (9th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

577 F.3d 1014 (2009)

Miriam FLORES, individually and as a parent of Miriam Flores, minor child; Rosa Rzeslawski, individually and as a parent of Mario Rzeslawski, minor child, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and
Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and President of The Arizona Senate, Intervenor,
v.
STATE OF ARIZONA, Defendant-Appellee,
Thomas C. Horne, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Defendant-Appellant, and
C. Diane Bishop, Superintendent of Public Instruction; Eugene Hughes; David Silva; Claudine Bates Arthur; John Hosner; Ken Bennett; Ray Kellis; Jim Allman; Morrison Warren, members of the State Board of Education, Defendants.
Miriam Flores, individually and as a parent of Miriam Flores, minor child; Rosa Rzeslawski, individually and as a parent of Mario Rzeslawski, minor child, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and President of The Arizona Senate, Intervenor-Appellant,
v.
State of Arizona; C. Diane Bishop, Superintendent of Public Instruction; Eugene Hughes; David Silva; Claudine Bates Arthur; John Hosner; Ken *1015 Bennett; Ray Kellis; Jim Allman; Morrison Warren, members of the State Board of Education; Thomas C. Horne, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Defendants.

Nos. 07-15603, 07-15605.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

August 13, 2009.

Joy Ellen Herr-Cardillo, Tucson, AZ, Timothy M. Hogan, Esquire, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

D. Aaron Brown, Attorney Advisor, David J. Cantelme, Esquire, Cantelme & Brown, PLC, Phoenix, AZ, for Intervenor.

Lynne Christensen Adams, Kimberly Anne Demarchi, David Dickson Garner, Esquire, Lewis & Roca, LLP, Susan M. Segal, Esquire, Arizona Attorney General's Office, Phoenix, AZ, Jose A. Cardenas, Esquire, Arizona State University Office of General Counsel, Tempe, AZ, for Defendant-Appellee.

Lynne Christensen Adams, Jose A. Cardenas, Esquire, Kimberly Anne Demarchi, David Dickson Garner, Esquire, Susan M. Segal, Esquire, for Defendants.

Eric J. Bistrow, Esquire, Burch & Cracchiolo, PA, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: B. FLETCHER, MARSHA S. BERZON and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

We remand this case to the District Court to comply with the Supreme Court's decision in Horne v. Flores, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 2579, 2607, 174 L.Ed.2d 406 (2009).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horne v. Flores
557 U.S. 433 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Flores v. Arizona
577 F.3d 1014 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
577 F.3d 1014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flores-v-state-ca9-2009.