Flores v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Flores v. State

39 S.W.3d 774, 344 Ark. 290, 2001 Ark. LEXIS 181

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided March 22, 2001·No. CR 01-239·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Bryant Flores, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney, Daniel D. Becker, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Bryant Flores, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney, Daniel D. Becker, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Flores v. State, 39 S.W.3d 774, 344 Ark. 290, 2001 Ark. LEXIS 181 (Ark. 2001).

Pincite

39 S.W.3d 774 (Flores v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.