Flores v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Flores v. Santiago

34 A.D.2d 926, 311 N.Y.S.2d 972, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4468

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.D.2d 926 (Flores v. Santiago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flores v. Santiago, 34 A.D.2d 926, 311 N.Y.S.2d 972, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4468 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered October 10, 1969, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements, and plaintiffs’ motion for general preference granted. The affidavit of Candida Morales, the medical reports and hospital records establish prima facie serious injuries and possible permanent or protracted disability resulting from the accident. We conclude that on the record a general preference is warranted as to Candida Morales. No good purpose would be served by severing her cause from that of the remaining plaintiffs so the scope of this determination embraces and extends to all of the plaintiffs. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Nunez and Tilzer, JJ.

[927]*927(Republished.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered October 10, 1969, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements, and plaintiffs’ motion for general preference granted. The affidavit of Candida Morales, the medical reports and hospital records establish prima facie serious injuries and possible permanent or protracted disability resulting from the accident. We conclude that on the record a general preference is warranted as to Candida Morales. No good purpose would be served by severing her cause from that of the remaining plaintiffs so the scope of this determination embraces and extends to all of the plaintiffs. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Nunez and Tilzer, JJ.

[927]*927(Republished.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.2d 926, 311 N.Y.S.2d 972, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flores-v-santiago-nyappdiv-1970.