Flores v. San Angel 2 of Arkansas Inc
This text of Flores v. San Angel 2 of Arkansas Inc (Flores v. San Angel 2 of Arkansas Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS DELTA DIVISION
GRACIELA FERNANDEZ FLORES PLAINTIFF
V. No. 2:23-cv-175-DPM
SAN ANGEL 2 OF ARKANSAS, INC. and FRANCISO JAVIER ROMO DEFENDANTS
ORDER Joint motion, Doc. 11, granted. The proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1353 (11th Cir. 1982); see also Barbee v. Big River Steel, LLC, 927 F.3d 1024, 2027 (8th Cir. 2019); Melgar v. OK Foods, 902 F.3d 775, 779 (8th Cir. 2018). It reflects a good-faith compromise of the parties’ wage-related dispute and their Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act dispute. And the parties negotiated the attorney’s fees and costs separately. Barbee, 927 F.3d at 1027. Plus those fees related to all claims. The complaint will be dismissed with prejudice. So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 5 Pelnyary 20ar
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Flores v. San Angel 2 of Arkansas Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flores-v-san-angel-2-of-arkansas-inc-ared-2024.