Flores v. San Angel 2 of Arkansas Inc

District Court, E.D. Arkansas·Decided February 5, 2024·No. 2:23-cv-00175·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS DELTA DIVISION

GRACIELA FERNANDEZ FLORES PLAINTIFF

V. No. 2:23-cv-175-DPM

SAN ANGEL 2 OF ARKANSAS, INC. and FRANCISO JAVIER ROMO DEFENDANTS

ORDER Joint motion, Doc. 11, granted. The proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1353 (11th Cir. 1982); see also Barbee v. Big River Steel, LLC, 927 F.3d 1024, 2027 (8th Cir. 2019); Melgar v. OK Foods, 902 F.3d 775, 779 (8th Cir. 2018). It reflects a good-faith compromise of the parties’ wage-related dispute and their Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act dispute. And the parties negotiated the attorney’s fees and costs separately. Barbee, 927 F.3d at 1027. Plus those fees related to all claims. The complaint will be dismissed with prejudice. So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 5 Pelnyary 20ar

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flores v. San Angel 2 of Arkansas Inc, (E.D. Ark. 2024).

Flores v. San Angel 2 of Arkansas Inc (Flores v. San Angel 2 of Arkansas Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ana Melgar v. OK Foods
902 F.3d 775 (Eighth Circuit, 2018)
Barbee v. Big River Steel, LLC
927 F.3d 1024 (Eighth Circuit, 2019)