Flores v. Nikac

121 A.D.3d 577, 993 N.Y.S.2d 910
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 23, 2014·No. 13287 303858/11·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sharon A.M. Aarons, J.), entered January 16, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the common-law negligence cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants’ initial moving papers failed to establish prima facie that they were not negligent in connection with the decedent’s death.

It was only in reply to plaintiff’s opposition to the motion that defendants raised arguments specifically addressing plaintiff’s allegations, their duty under the common law, and the evidence in the record (for example, they contend that defendant Nina Nikac cannot be held liable for the decedent’s death because she was not the owner of the building). Since these arguments were not timely raised, we do not consider them (see Ritt v Lenox Hill Hosp., 182 AD2d 560, 561-562 [1st Dept 1992]).

Concur — Friedman, J.E, Sweeny, Acosta, Saxe and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flores v. Nikac, 121 A.D.3d 577, 993 N.Y.S.2d 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

121 A.D.3d 577 (Flores v. Nikac) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hernandez v. Metro Mgt. & Dev., Inc.
2019 NY Slip Op 8531 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)