Flores v. Meese

992 F.2d 243, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3633, 93 Daily Journal DAR 6255, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 11357
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Flores v. Meese. Read the opinion of the Court — 913 F.2d 1315
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 18, 1993·No. 88-6249·Published

Opinion

992 F.2d 243

Jenny Lisette FLORES, a minor, by next friend Mario Hugh
GALVEZ-MALDONADO; Dominga Hernandez-Hernandez, a minor, by
next friend Jose Saul Mira; Alma Yanira Cruz-Aldama, a
minor, by next friend Herman Perililo Tanchez, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Edwin MEESE, III; Immigration & Naturalization Service;
Harold Ezell, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 88-6249.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

May 18, 1993.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, and TANG, SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, THOMPSON, LEAVY, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

Pursuant to the mandate of the United States Supreme Court in Reno v. Flores, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1439, 123 L.Ed.2d 1 (1993), this case is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion of the United States Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flores v. Meese, 992 F.2d 243, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3633, 93 Daily Journal DAR 6255, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 11357 (9th Cir. 1993).

992 F.2d 243 (Flores v. Meese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reno v. Flores
507 U.S. 292 (Supreme Court, 1993)