Flores v. Meese
This text of 992 F.2d 243 (Flores v. Meese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
992 F.2d 243
Jenny Lisette FLORES, a minor, by next friend Mario Hugh
GALVEZ-MALDONADO; Dominga Hernandez-Hernandez, a minor, by
next friend Jose Saul Mira; Alma Yanira Cruz-Aldama, a
minor, by next friend Herman Perililo Tanchez, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Edwin MEESE, III; Immigration & Naturalization Service;
Harold Ezell, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 88-6249.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
May 18, 1993.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.
Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, and TANG, SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, THOMPSON, LEAVY, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
Pursuant to the mandate of the United States Supreme Court in Reno v. Flores, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1439, 123 L.Ed.2d 1 (1993), this case is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion of the United States Supreme Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
992 F.2d 243, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3633, 93 Daily Journal DAR 6255, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 11357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flores-v-meese-ca9-1993.