Home/New York Court of Appeals/Flores v. LANGSAM PROPERTY SERVICES CORP.

Flores v. LANGSAM PROPERTY SERVICES CORP.

918 N.E.2d 944, 13 N.Y.3d 811
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 20, 2009·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

*812 OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact regarding defendants’ actual or constructive notice of the particular dangerous condition that allegedly caused her injuries (see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 838 [1986]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flores v. LANGSAM PROPERTY SERVICES CORP., 918 N.E.2d 944, 13 N.Y.3d 811 (N.Y. 2009).

918 N.E.2d 944 (Flores v. LANGSAM PROPERTY SERVICES CORP.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McIntyre v. Bradford White Corp.
222 A.D.3d 1077 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Floyd v. 1710 Realty, LLC
2016 NY Slip Op 8840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Frassinelli v. 120 East 73rd Street Corp.
136 A.D.3d 476 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Transitional Services of New York for Long Island, Inc. v. New York State Office of Mental Health
91 F. Supp. 3d 438 (E.D. New York, 2015)
Gonzalez v. American Steel Processing Co.
76 A.D.2d 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)