Flores v. LANGSAM PROPERTY SERVICES CORP.

New York Court of Appeals

Flores v. LANGSAM PROPERTY SERVICES CORP.

918 N.E.2d 944, 13 N.Y.3d 811

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 20, 2009

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 918 N.E.2d 944 (Flores v. LANGSAM PROPERTY SERVICES CORP.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flores v. LANGSAM PROPERTY SERVICES CORP., 918 N.E.2d 944, 13 N.Y.3d 811 (N.Y. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

*812 OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact regarding defendants’ actual or constructive notice of the particular dangerous condition that allegedly caused her injuries (see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 838 [1986]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI